Stylus rmx vs maschine
The average quality of samples and their pace of adding contents is more than good. A lot of pulsing/single note strumming-ostinato type stuff which totally fills my needs.
I used it in one project and I probably spent 7-8 hours of working time with Arcade. That will probably be a deal breaker for me once demo ends - it will really depend on how aggressive they are with improving overall interface, adding sounds to the library, and whether the quality is sustained.Īnyway - anyone else trying it out? Again, I think it has potential - just some pretty critical issues I feel need to be addressed. Composer Cloud), but not for a single instrument with a pretty narrow purpose. I get subscriptions when it's multiple products (eg. And with such a big catalog, and because they keep adding to it, they want steady user revenue to keep building that library. I'm guessing they went with this since the libraries have to be auditioned / downloaded. Definitely a big point to Stylus RMX, which has a much more extensive FX pallet.ġ00 day demo is cool, but do not like the subscription model after demo period. Also, FX section seems a little weak filters aren't great, reverb / delays are a bit meh. As far as I can tell it doesn't allow midi drag and drop like Stylus - still working through manual, but if that feature is missing that's a big miss. With some improvements this could quite easily replace Stylus RMX for me.which is ancient, although has its uses. And definitely like that it allows custom imports. I don't need reverb or delay parameters to be a dedicated page that takes up 75% of the UI.Īlthough library selection is large, there does seem to be some great content. This is why I like U-He design so much - efficiency speed, and you can see so many parameters in one view: filters, fx, modulation, envelope, etc. I wish designers would realize a lot of people are high rez monitors, and would prefer multiple programming / fx features on the same page. Also suffers from the usual Omnisphere design style where every feature is on a different page, so you have to constantly be clicking around to go from modulation, to effects, to library. UI should have an option to be twice as big, especially for people on large high-rez monitors. The UI seems to be WAY too small - especially for browsing, and keeping track of what is loaded. Browser tags are not nearly specific enough to narrow results down efficiently. Sample catalog seems to be absolutely enormous - like maybe too big to really ever get a sense of what's available. You can pretty quickly turn a straight acoustic sample into something very cool / unique. Seems to have a lot of potential for sound design and pulse design. Just trying out the demo, curious what others thought. Hopefully I'm in the right forum category - it seems to fit in the Spectrasonics Stylus RMX family and I guess a "sample library" of sorts.